Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 07:46

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Are Indian youths conservative or liberal?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
‘Amazing Worlds of Science Fiction and Science Fact’ Review: An Education in Exoplanets - WSJ
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Is there an MBTI personality that is more or less likely to handle stress?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Have you ever seen a woman having sex with a dog?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump White House opens door to historic military deployment on U.S. soil - The Washington Post
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.